Please note: This blog is no longer updated and has moved to a new location: Scott Mark.

Tuesday, May 02, 2006

Curious What Offline Blog Tools People Use

Thinking about starting to use an offline editor for posting, and curious what anyone can recommend. So far, I have seen mention of these in other posts:

But no strong recommendations either way... would appreciate recommendations both for and against various tools if anyone has them.

5 Comments:

At 1:25 PM, Blogger Philip Hartman said...

I've only used Blogger for Word. It shows up as a plugin on MS-Word. Its OK. Some of the MS-Word formatting doesn't translate into HTML very well. But... its easy.

Thanks for visiting my blog and putting a link to my post about SAP in del.icio.us. You helped a lot of new readers discover my blog for the first time. I hope you'll visit again soon and hopefully I'll have something else worth sharing by then.

 
At 9:27 AM, Anonymous brenda michelson said...

I've just started using Qumana. It's good for basic posting, and has a clean connection with Typepad (my host). It doesn't allow you to schedule posts for a later date, which is something I'd like. I haven't been very successful with the "Drop pad" feature, but that could just be me. Another one to look at (but not free) is ecto. -brenda

 
At 7:45 AM, Blogger scott said...

Philip - I forgot about the Word plug-in, thanks for the reminder. The very idea of Word and HTML scares me, but I should give it a try! Your SAP post was great - keep it coming.

Brenda - Thanks for your comment! I didn't know you were a reader - I have subscribed to you for awhile, and love your content. I'm going to be responding to your recent SOA post - that was great!

Back on topic... my first Qumana post just went out and it was a catastrophe. The technorati tags got totally hosed, I had to go back to the file system to strip <font> tags, and then somehow half my post disappeared when I published to Blogger. Yikes! I ended up re-doing the post through the Blogger editor. I don't know if I'll try it again. I had forgotten about ecto - I'll give that a shot. Maybe I just need to forget the Blogger integration and just use a local editor!

 
At 12:50 PM, Anonymous Bill de hOra said...

Scott,

I had Qumana down as revisit, and am still using w.bloggar. What I don't like about w.blogar is that a) pulling down posts is clumsy, b) there doesn't seem to be way to work on more than one at a time. I use the performancing plugin here and there.

I think there's an opportunity to write a solid blog/site editor; none of the current crop nail it. Naturally the free version would have an adbox in the UI :)


http://www.dehora.net/journal/2006/04/software_tryouts.html

 
At 11:56 PM, Blogger scott said...

Bill - I think I downloaded w.bloggar but still haven't tried that yet; I need to do that. I gave Qumana another try, and will probably still use that on occasion, but I share your distaste for the typeface. And maybe I'm asking for too much, but it's bunk you can't edit source through these tools IMHO. Maybe I really just need to stick with Ultraedit, or grab a copy of HomeSite or something...

I would definitely deal with adware if it was just good!

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

Trackbacks

<< Home